BNP AM

The sustainable investor for a changing world

Search for

Filter by

Asset class

Economics

Geography

Investing

Curves road in fields
PORTFOLIO PERSPECTIVES | WHITE PAPER – 5 Min

Asset Allocation Monthly – Different phases

Maya Bhandari
Daniel Morris
By MAYA BHANDARI, DANIEL MORRIS 10.05.2023

In this article:

    In our latest Asset Allocation Monthly, we present our view of where the three main regions are in the different phases of the business cycle: US is close to the end, Europe is 8-12 months behind, but still late cycle, while emerging markets approach the start of a new business cycle.  

    From an investment perspective, the US and Europe are decoupling. 

    • The US economy is moving towards recession as growth and inflation fall
    • European inflation is slowing without a material softening in growth.
    • Emerging market growth prospects are improving even as those for developed markets weaken. 

    This broadly favourable currentmacroeconomic setting notwithstanding, we note that high European company earnings expectations are skewed by the prospects for specific sectors and their weight in benchmark indices.

    Bonds and investment-grade credit

    Corporate bond credit spreads have rallied after the banking-turmoil-triggered widening (see Exhibit 1). We took advantage of this to reduce the exposure of multi-asset portfolios to European investment grade corporate bonds. Positions are now at about one third of what they were earlier this year. Our overall view remains ‘favour’ (see table on page 5) since the compensation from the risk premium relative to likely defaults remains well above the historical range.

    The view on where policy rates in the US and the eurozone will peak has shifted notably. Immediately before the banking sector turmoil, US central bank rates were forecast to reach 5.5-6.0%. Pricing has now moved to imply almost 150bp of cuts within the next year. In Europe, the moves have been less dramatic, but the ECB’s peak rate is now expected at around 3.75%, with one or two rate cuts in the following six months. We believe such excessive optimism is supportive of short positions.

    US and European equities

    We currently see downside risks to the outlook for the US economy and company earnings. Moreover, our market temperature framework is now flashing ‘red’ for the first time since 2021. As a result, we have nudged down our US equities exposures albeit remaining in the broadly ‘neutral’ zone.

    While analysts have already cut their estimates for US earnings, we regard even the lower level of expected earnings as still too high given a weak macroeconomic outlook (see Exhibit 2). Anecdotal evidence from cyclical and consumer staples companies has fanned our concerns over the downside risks: many staples companies have passed on price rises of 10% or more in the first quarter alone, which could cloud their outlook. Further declines in analyst earnings expectations would reduce the attractiveness of US equities by raising price-earnings multiples.

    In Europe, however, our optimism around the case for European banks relative to US banks has grown. Accordingly, we have added a modest position in European banks relative to broader European indices. European banks have recently posted earnings showing better-than-expected bad debt provisioning and firm net interest income. Additionally, many banks are exposed to the positive interest income trends in Latin America.

    Macroeconomic fundamentals are also supportive with sticky inflation, which favours higher- for-longer interest rates and hence the prospect for further (net interest) margin expansion. European banks have well-capitalised balance sheets with large liquidity portfolios, and a diversified deposit base which continues to grow. Furthermore, the regulatory framework has been far more rigorous than for their US counterparts.

    Valuations are attractive, with the 12-month forward price-earnings ratio at a 23-year low. In relative terms, the price of the broad STOXX Europe 600 index is nearing its 2023 peak level, while the narrower SX7E banks index is still 14% below.

    For eurozone equities more generally, earnings forecasts have held up much better than elsewhere (see Exhibit 2). Negative earnings revisions continue for the US, with evidence of margin compression across the board. Overall, we are neutral on equities.

    Emerging market equities

    With expectations for a recession in the US and stability in Europe, the forecasted expansion of the Chinese economy stands in stark contrast. Given the size of the Chinese economy, growth there should benefit emerging Asian countries more broadly. Chinese inflation remains low (year-on-year core inflation currently stands at 0.5%!), meaning the People’s Bank of China has scope to lower policy rates to support growth if needed.

    Beyond the diverging macroeconomic outlook, emerging market earnings expectations have fallen sharply over the last two years, widening the gap with developed markets. Consequently, we see from current levels more potential for gains in emerging market equity earnings and declines in developed market earnings. As a result of EM equity underperformance over the last couple of years, valuations based on forward price-earnings multiples are relatively low versus developed markets.

    A compelling case, one would think, for the outperformance of emerging market versus developed market equities. Year-to-date, however, emerging market equities have underperformed by about 5%. What might explain the divergence, and more importantly, will it persist?

    Poor sentiment is one factor. Investors worry about the potential for further decoupling of the US and Chinese economies, with comparatively more damage done to the latter economy than the former. There are lingering concerns about the Chinese government’s commitment to developing private sector companies as opposed to state-owned enterprises. The deterioration in sentiment partly explains the lower valuations of EM/Chinese equities described above. Sentiment, however, is unlikely to worsen indefinitely, and could yet rebound.

    A second factor has been the robust performance of the (US) technology sector, which has not been shared by the Chinese technology sector, in contrast to the historical relationship where the correlation between the two markets is high. For non-technology sectors, developed and emerging market equity indices have performed roughly in line (though even here, EM has not outperformed as one might hope; see Exhibit 3).

    US technology stocks have benefited on two fronts. The market’s pricing of a near-term Fed pivot to cutting policy rates has reduced the discount rate for long-duration technology shares. Chinese interest rate expectations by contrast have been largely unchanged. The fall in US discount rates has boosted valuations for technology stocks, reversing the phenomenon of last year when rising rate expectations caused price-earnings ratios to fall sharply.

    Beyond the short-term boost to valuations, tech stocks are also now benefiting from better earnings expectations, also a reversal of a more recent phenomenon. Over the last few earnings seasons, S&P 500 earnings have beaten expectations, except for the tech sector. As tech sector earnings normalised following the pandemic boom, analysts had difficulty determining what the new post-Covid level of earnings should be. This quarter, however, tech sector earnings have beaten expectations by 5%. Results for Chinese companies, by contrast, have disappointed.

    These two factors, poor sentiment and strong US technology stock performance, explain why emerging market equities have not outperformed as hoped. Nonetheless, given the fundamental factors described above, we believe sentiment will eventually bottom, and that earnings for emerging market equities more broadly will start to outpace those in developed markets. Index price performance should follow suit.

    Our asset class views

    Disclaimer

    Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
    Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund's) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

    Related posts

    Weekly Market Update – A very gradual recovery in the eurozone economy
    Front of mind | Article - 3 Min

    Weekly Market Update – A very gradual recovery in the eurozone economy

    Recent data suggests the eurozone is gradually recovering, but underlines a state of economic divergence, with Germany in particular lagging...

    ANDREW CRAIG
    | 29.02.2024
    Talking Heads – Looking to Turkey for some investing delight
    Portfolio perspectives | Podcast - 9:43 MIN

    Talking Heads – Looking to Turkey for some investing delight

    Robust domestic demand and a now sound and simplified monetary policy strengthen the investment case for Turkish assets in 2024....

    HUSEYIN AKAR
    +1 other(s)
    | 26.02.2024

    Viewpoint highlights

    Subscribe to receive this week’s articles straight to your inbox.

    Please enter a valid email
    Please check the boxes below to subscribe

    FOLLOW VIEWPOINT

    Receive daily updates