The sustainable investor for a changing world

Search for

Filter by

Asset class





Talking Heads – Higher for longer bolsters outlook for money market funds

Daniel Morris

In this article:

    Money market funds have been in favour as central banks tightened monetary policy. Today,  the declared intention among leading central banks to maintain key rates at high levels, provides continued support. Investment Specialist Thibault Malin talks to Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist, about the bright outlook for money markets in this Talking Heads podcast.   

    Fund managers have leeway to actively manage and adapt investment strategies to add value, Thibaud notes. This smooths performance and allows investors to navigate testing times in other asset classes.

    You can also listen and subscribe to Talking Heads on YouTube


    Read the transcript

    This is an audio transcript of the Talking Heads podcast episode: Higher for longer bolsters outlook for money market funds

    Daniel Morris: Hello and welcome to the BNP Paribas Asset Management Talking Heads podcast. Every week, Talking Heads will bring you in-depth insights and analysis on the topics that really matter to investors. In this episode, we’ll be discussing money markets. I’m Daniel Morris, Chief Market Strategist and I’m joined today by Thibault Malin, Investment Specialist. Welcome, Thibault, thanks for joining me.

    Thibault Malin: Hello Daniel, thank you.

    DM: For many markets, in terms of the uncertainties around central bank policy rates, recession (or not), rate cutting (or not) this year has been more challenging than normal. If we think about how money market funds have responded to this environment so far, they’ve reacted to the rate hikes delivered by the central banks, but the concern is now if and when rates start to decrease, how is that going to affect the performance of money market funds?

    TM: It is true that money market funds’ performance is highly correlated with the rate environment as they are very short-term products. Their rate and credit durations, however, are managed actively, which means that whatever the economic and rate environment, portfolio managers have ways of adding value versus their benchmarks.

    This is a strength of money market funds. If we look at periods like 2014 to 2016, when the European Central Bank had to cut its rates below zero, money market funds were able to respond to this through active management of their rate and credit durations.

    We do not anticipate rate cuts in the coming months – it may happen in 2024. If rates start to fall, we will adapt our investment strategies to seek to continue to outperform our benchmarks, even in a negative rate environment.

    DM: Alongside predicting what’s going to happen with short-term interest rates, there is an entire regulatory framework that affects money market funds. How will that evolve in the months and year ahead?

    TM: The current regulation entered into force in 2019 and was scheduled for review in 2022. This summer – one year late due to the geopolitical conflicts that the European Commission (EC) had to deal with – the EC released its report on the functioning of the money market fund regulation.

    The idea was to review whether money market funds’ liquidity was sufficient to meet all the requirements alongside their rate credit durations. With the challenging environment we have had over the past four years – the real-life stress test of the Covid crisis, the liquidity crisis in March 2020, the changing policy rate paradigm across the euro, sterling and US dollar, and the credit stress in 2023 after the US regional banks crisis – the regulators had many indicators to analyse.

    It appears that the regulators now deem money market funds resilient enough to continue to be sold and to perform under the current regulation. More indicators may be added after the end of the current EC presidency at the end of 2024; there could be another review that might add new liquidity requirements for money market funds. But as of now, it seems regulators and asset managers agree that money market funds are extremely resilient.

    DM: When the central banks do eventually start cutting policy rates, are we likely to see redemptions from money market funds as soon as that starts?

    TM: It is true that money market funds have received subscriptions since we have had positive rates – in particularly high rates – but not that much, actually. We had a lot of subscriptions as soon as we entered the positive rate environment at the end of 2022, but this year, from January to August, we had about EUR 70 billion-worth of inflows into European money market funds across all currencies. That is not so high considering it is a market that totals more than EUR 1 600 billion.

    Many types of clients, such as insurance companies and asset managers, have subscribed to money market funds for different reasons. They have found money market funds attractive in a situation where we have an inverted yield curve, making it potentially better to invest for the short run as it currently outperforms long-term investments. These investors have started to redeem money market funds over the past few weeks to invest back in medium or long-term assets as we approach the end of this hiking cycle.

    However, it is important to mention that even if policy rates are cut in 2024 or 2025, it is unlikely that we will get back to the rate environment of early 2022, which should mean that money market funds remain attractive in terms of potential performance, even compared to other medium or long-term products, and to all type of clients.

    In the current environment, we are still seeing many clients with a renewed interest in money market funds, particularly the retail and private banking sectors, where it generally takes more time to adapt to the different economic cycles.

    DM: Thibault, thank you very much for joining me.

    TM: Thank you, Daniel.


    Please note that articles may contain technical language. For this reason, they may not be suitable for readers without professional investment experience. Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice. The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns. Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
    Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment risk: The lack of common or harmonised definitions and labels integrating ESG and sustainability criteria at EU level may result in different approaches by managers when setting ESG objectives. This also means that it may be difficult to compare strategies integrating ESG and sustainability criteria to the extent that the selection and weightings applied to select investments may be based on metrics that may share the same name but have different underlying meanings. In evaluating a security based on the ESG and sustainability criteria, the Investment Manager may also use data sources provided by external ESG research providers. Given the evolving nature of ESG, these data sources may for the time being be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable. Applying responsible business conduct standards in the investment process may lead to the exclusion of securities of certain issuers. Consequently, (the Sub-Fund's) performance may at times be better or worse than the performance of relatable funds that do not apply such standards.

    Related posts

    Weekly Market Update – A very gradual recovery in the eurozone economy
    Front of mind | Article - 3 Min

    Weekly Market Update – A very gradual recovery in the eurozone economy

    Recent data suggests the eurozone is gradually recovering, but underlines a state of economic divergence, with Germany in particular lagging...

    | 29.02.2024
    Graph of the week – Q1 2024, a tipping point for a new computer era?
    Front of mind | Article - 1 Min

    Graph of the week – Q1 2024, a tipping point for a new computer era?

    In February, a sharp rise in quarterly revenues reported by leading US manufacturers of semiconductor chips have further boosted the...

    | 28.02.2024

    Viewpoint highlights

    Subscribe to receive this week’s articles straight to your inbox.

    Please enter a valid email
    Please check the boxes below to subscribe


    Receive daily updates